Monday, December 26th, 2005 01:22 am
Public service announcement: my AIM screen name is going to be changing in a few days. Despite my attachment to it-- we've been together for a decade now, give or take-- there's no logical reason to keep AOL anymore. With AOL gone, I don't think there's any way to keep Scryer1.

The new SN is Damaskena. Shouldn't be that hard to remember, right?

Since I'm often asked . . . my Scryer1 SN was originally a small joke on my behalf. Scrying, of course, is using an inanimate object to access information or events happening far away, or to communicate with those who are distant . . . and how, then, is a computer so different from a mirror or a pool of still water?

It lends credence to the theory that any technology, sufficiently advanced, is indistinguishable from magic.

And a joyous Yuletide to one and all, by the way.
Friday, December 16th, 2005 01:26 am
The moon was full and bright tonight, an Ansel Adams over suburban Japan. For a while clouds veiled its brilliance, but when they drew away I saw beauty, and knew myself for a fool.

I tilted my head back and spoke directly to her: "Watch over me, Lady, for surely I am one of yours tonight."

Spend half an hour being an idiot, spend one hour making up for it.
Thursday, December 8th, 2005 01:54 am
"I know we're going to win," Bush told reporters at the White House. "Our troops need to hear not only are they supported, but that we have got a strategy that will win."

For once I agree with Bush. So, Mr. President, what is this strategy? The troops are just dying to know.

In fact, more than 2100 of them have been dying to know since this little shindig of yours started. I'm not dying to know, thank the gods, but I admit to being a little curious.

Quote lifted from this article.

This section of the Onion, as ever, made me laugh out loud. Just like the above article didn't. Especially the first of the Narnia and C-Section quotes.
Sunday, November 13th, 2005 02:04 pm
I was doing my normal click-around-newssites activity, and found the following articles. Don't read them if you can't handle descriptions of torture; but if you can't, you had better be angry at the American government.

Who they are: the double standard that underlies our torture policies

A Deadly Interrogation: can the CIA legally kill a prisoner?

Last Exit to Baghdad: the first soldier memoirs

I myself am apalled. People argue that extreme measures are neccessary when there are lives are at stake, and that these methods are for the greater good. However, my view of torture, and indeed my view of most actions that have a debated moral aspect, is that unless you're willing to do it yourself, you have no right to condone it if someone else does it. As a demonstrative case, the fact that I am not a vegetarian: although I've never done it, I am willing to kill, slaughter, and cook an animal. I've never done it, and I don't really want to do it, but I am willing and able to do it. To me, this translates as follows: I am willing to take responsibility for the act of eating meat. I do not divorce myself from the source of what's on my plate, as is so easy to do in today's world of conveniently pre-packaged foods. Nor do I commit the hypocricy of allowing someone else to do on my behalf what I would consider personally rupugnant.

So you had damn well better not approve of the use of torture unless you're willing to personally hold the knife, unless you can look into the eyes of another human being and see their pain and fear reflected there, unless you are willing to tear from them their dignity, their self respect, and their very humanity. With your own hands.

I am not willing to do that. I am not able to do that. And thus I can not and will not agree to have my government do it for me, no matter who, no matter where, no matter the reason.
Wednesday, November 9th, 2005 08:34 pm
Twenty things I want to do before I die, in no particular order:

1) See Jereusalem without dying (unless, of course, I'm resurrected from the dead three days later and let continue about my way. Though I can do without the Roman torture methods beforehand, thank you).
2) Become fluent in Japanese.
3) Move to England.
4) Become an editor at a major publishing house.
5) Write and publish a book.
6) Have a child named after me.
7) Become a good cook.
8) Tour Europe by motorcycle.
9) Adopt a child.
10) Visit Tibet.
11) Take the Trans-Siberian Railroad across Russia.
12) Buy a wonderful old house and fill it with curiosities gathered on my travels.
13) Learn how to play another instrument well.
14) Be owned by many, many cats.
15) Swim with dolphins.
16) Have an SO.
17) Learn how to sail a Real Boat.
18) Have grandchildren and spoil them mercilessly.
19) Make an angelfood cake as good as the one my roommate made that one time.
20) Buy one of those wonderful ghatto marrionettes in Venice.
Sunday, October 30th, 2005 09:14 pm
The world changes in infintismally small ways. There are small actions that can echo into avalanche, a tremor in the earth starts as a ripple and becomes a tidal wave. Slowly, slowly, as the echoes build, as the waters shift and grow, this earth can be made anew.

Slowly.

I have to believe that, and likewise have to believe that the world I live in is one that was beyond dreaming a mere ten decades ago. They could not have seen it, the wonders and terrors to come, could not have imagined the shape of the world as it is now.

When I die, I will die in a different world than the one I was born to. Will I be one of those tremors, one of those echoes, one small rock dropped into still waters? I doubt it, but this is not a thing for me to decide. It is not in our stars, nor is it in our selves, but the inscrutable weavings of circumstance, of motivation and counter-motivation, in action and reaction, in the swing of the pendulum and the beat of a butterfly's wings.

Is there a hand that weaves, a will that patterns? It is not for me to know or to say, not in this life. But change is everywhere, all will change whether we will it or not. To throw ourselves against the wave or behind it, and then to build again in its wake, that is what is left to us.
Monday, October 10th, 2005 12:51 am
It's been a busy weekend.

It rained yesterday, with a fury matched only by the way it rained on Wednesday, when I taught one class of students the expression, "it's raining cats and dogs." I spent most of it in my apartment, but come afternoon the rain had slacked somewhat, and I grabbed my umbrella and my courage and headed for Momoyama.

花がさまつり (since I only know one of the required kanji . . .)

I was early for once, but the meeting place was a Media down the hill from the huge vermillion tori, and they were playing the ad for Advent Children over and over, so I didn't much mind. Once we were all assembled, we headed over under still-grey skies to the apartment complex that had invited us. The lobby was decorated with a small gold-and laquered shrine crowned with a phoenix; the hall beyond it was full of brightly-colored umbrellas made of consecutive rings of plastic flowers. The apartment complex itself surrounded a small open courtyard, shielded from the inclement weather by a huge tarp. We were herded to an underground room to don happi coats and headbands, then we waited around for events to unfold. Waiting was fascilitated by beer, and by watching the hordes of small children in miniature happi running back and forth. Most of the women and children, and some of the men, were wearing happi; others were wearing black trousers with red and purple sashes around their waists, over white wrapping-- to stabilize their backs? They also had large black cushions strapped over their shoulders.

At a certain point wooden boxes of sake were handed out, and a man with a bullhorn shouted out the kannpai and other anouncements before everyone began to flow out into the street. I nabbed a purple umbrella decorated with maple leaves and bells on my way out. Somehow we all ended up in the covered shopping arcade that was nearby, where all the men in black trousers assembled around a huge wooden box crowned with three massive red-and-gold layers of flower-umbrella.

At some sort of signal that I completely missed, the men hoisted the shrine into the air and onto their shoulders. And then they proceeded to parade the thing through the streets, led by others who were carrying the other huge flower-umbellas and the horde of women and children in blue happi. Every once and a while they would halt, and then to a very basic drum-and-chant-- "fi-to! fi-to! fi-to!" and "oi-oi-oi-yo!"-- would perform a bizarre dance that involved everyone holding the shrine hopping back and forth from one leg to the other. At either end of the shrine were long ropes held by women whose job was to stabilize the shrine and keep it from going forward/backward/left/right, which it was constantly in danger of doing. Once in a while they even hoisted it all the way up into the air on outstretched arms and shook it up and down.

Progress was slow but steady, all the way down the length of the shopping arcade, across the train tracks, and up the hill through the torii to the main gate to the shrine. I was glad of my umbrella before I was finished, since it kept me mostly dry through the whole experience, at least until the rain had stopped towards the end. I hopped up and down and chanted as enthusiastically as the next person-- well, possibly more enthusiastically then my fellow AETs, because I was absolutely ready to get carried away by the intoxicating rush of the whole thing. I even took my turn at hauling on the shrine ropes, trying to keep the thing upright and steady.

Eventually we got the shrine back to the apartment complex, a complicated endeavor due to narrow streets and low-strung power cables. Once it was back there were further dances from the umbrella-bearers, and the shrine was lifted once again for a last hearty dance before everyone tropped back into the courtyard . . .

. . . for food! And there was quite a spread, too, soups and curry and rice, maki and croquettes and fishcake and dumplings and tiny sandwiches and yakisoba and all of those foods that I don't know the names of but are becoming increasingly familiar to me. And more beer, of course, and sake, and everyone from the apartment complex laughing and talking. All the children were running around, chasing each other and behaving the way kids do no matter where in the world you might be. All the adults were enjoying themselves, some of them with increasing levels of intoxication . . . every once and a while someone would come by and try out their English (a surprising number), or somehow through a hodgepodge of Japanese and English we'd somehow manage to communicate. One AET, especially tall, ended up arm-wrestling a succession of Japanese guys, with both victories and defeats on both sides met with cheers and applause. When the party began to subside, all of us foreigners were rounded up and herded into a nearby apartment to socialize for a while with our hosts before we headed back to our respective abodes.
Friday, October 7th, 2005 07:54 pm
While studying Japanese today, I asked one of the teachers to explain the difference between うち and いえ to me. They both mean "home," but うち has the additional connotation of belonging. It's opposite, according to the teacher, is "外"-- the same "がい" used in "外国人," "foreigner," and it's well-known abreviation, "がいじん."

Person who does not belong.

It makes me feel deeply lonely.

Although I have to say that there's something awesome about having elementary school kids flip out when you walk past. They were totally going, "OMG, it's a foreigner! She must live somewhere near here! OMG!" And one of them hid behind the other one, and they both managed a respectable "herro!" once they were done flipping out. It was really funny.

Mike Wyzgowski's "Nothing Can Be Explained" (vocal version) from the Bleach soundtrack is perhaps one of the spookiest songs I've ever heard. After Tori's cover of "'97 Bonnie and Clyde," because no song in existance is spookier than that one.

So, next week, due to midterms and class trips, I have no classes. Whatsoever. And so, I am going to do something right now that might possibly be considered suicidal. Though that might be overly optimistic.

I am taking writing requests.

If you're reading this, you may make one request, and I will produce at least a page of writing (typed) in response. I prefer that these requests be at least somewhat specific, "write a story," does not qualify. "Write a poem" does, but I reserve the right to answer this request with a five-minute crap haiku. And of course I can't write a fanfic for some show I've never heard of or flat-out hate. But maybe you have a character that you particularly like and would like to see more of? Or there's a story or scene from way back when that you want continued? Or you want my thoughts on trees? Or you want me to come up with a story about a canister of magical potato chips?

I do reserve the right to refuse unreasonable requests, of course. "Write a sestina in which every third line begins with a dirty word," for instance. But I trust you all to be reasonable . . .

Well, hopefully one of you likes my writing enough to actually request something.
Tuesday, September 13th, 2005 10:51 pm
Was clicking around CNN this evening, as is my wont, and I found among the various depressing articles on Hurricane Katrina (perhaps the most depressing was the fact that Bush's approval ratings were higher than I expected. Great gods, what is it going to take before people realize? That and the attempts to mend his lousy hurricane-related public image, which had my torn between laughing and crying . . .), this article on a soon-to-be-released movie (soonish, anyway) called Brokeback Mountain.

This is particularly amusing to me because the director is Ang Lee, who is most famous for Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, but who also directed many other movies. The above, which is sadly becoming known as "the gay cowboy movie," is hardly a departure from his previous work, as anyone who's seen the Wedding Banquet would know.

I saw the Wedding Banquet back in my Asian film class last year. My professor had a strange fascination with showing us films featuring gay men, for reasons I was never exactly clear on. By the time we finished watching exerpts from Happy Together (said excerpts chosen by said professor and featuring several fairly explicit sex scenes), I turned to my friend and asked, "um, so, are we likely to find the professor at Chumley's on a Friday night?"

Her: "Um, actually, he's married. I've met his wife."

Me: "Well, I guess it's good that he has such an open mind, then."

Chumley's was my university's closest gay bar, in case you were wondering. Maybe that professor's just very comfortable with his heterosexuality . . .

A cookie to anyone who gets the joke.

Gyllenhaal, one of the leads, has a really sweet quote in the article, too.

Anyway, I want to see Brokeback Mountain now. Hopefully it'll still be playing when I come home around Christmas. Hey, [livejournal.com profile] vash_donutangel, want to go see it with me? Since we've already started a tradition of watching the Gay Channel until the early hours of the morning (oh gods . . . no more Erasure for at least five years, I think I still have mental scars . . .). Maybe you and I and Emm can make a Naninani Yakuza night of it, hm? Complete with Ben & Jerry's. In December!
Sunday, September 11th, 2005 11:46 pm
I haven't said anything about the Katrina Disaster . . . everyone else has, and undoubtably has said it better. Of course I feel a certain sense of outrage at the situation and worry for those affected . . . words are too small and inadequate. "Storm victims," the word is everywhere, but I can't help but feel they're government victims, also . . . well. We'll let the articles speak for themselves, shall we?

White House Enacts a Plan to Ease Political Damage

The proof of the above article's in the pudding, naturally. Note especially the DeLay quote:
GOP leaders agree to joint Katrina hearings

The Press:
The Rebellion of the Talking Heads
White House Press Briefing: Angry Reporters Hit McClellan Hard on Hurricane, Ask if Heads Will Roll

Links taken from MacHall's comments section.
Wednesday, August 31st, 2005 11:53 pm
Beware, outspoken and somewhat bitter politicking. Read at your own risk.

So, President Bush says that Sept. 11 was Pearl Harbor and the Afghanistan/Iraq wars are like WWII.

In both instances, according to him, America went to war only after the attack of a "merciless enemy."

So that would have been Japan in WWII. Of course Japan is an American ally now, which is undoubtably the conclusion Bush wants us all to reach. The deep and tearing irony of it, of course, is that all that occured after the US dropped two atomic bombs on Japan, completely leveling two cities, killing hundreds of thousands of people (most of them civillians), and smashing the world into the nuclear age.

And since this is the nuclear age, we have to worry about things like bothersome dictators coming up with "weapons of mass destruction," so much so that a president can use the merest rumor of them to drop our country into war.

Because the gods forbid that someone with a grudge against the US, far too common in this day and age, should acquire that destructive power. Even just a single warhead, strategically aimed, could mean the complete destruction of life as we know it.

And of course we would know, having already done it ourselves.

Bush also wants to equate himself with Franklin D. Roosevelt, which is also tearingly funny on a variety of different levels. One of those is the fact that Roosevelt helped to pull the US out of the Great Depression, wheras Bush's record is nowhere near so good. Since Bush was elected, millions of jobs have gone up in smoke, the economy's tumbled since it's highs during the Clinton administration, the deficit has balloned wildly to keep up with war expenditures, oil prices go higher and higher, and oh yes, looks like poverty's on the rise, too.
Sunday, August 28th, 2005 10:18 pm
I don't usually bother with these, and it might take me a few days before I reply to any posts in response to this, but I am occasionally a woman of my word.

1. Reply with your name and I will write something random about you.
2. I will then tell you what song/movie reminds me of you.
3. I will pick a flavor of ice cream I would feed you.
4. I will say something that only makes sense to you and me.
5. I will tell you my first or most vivid memory of you.
6. I will tell you what animal you remind me of.
7. I'll then ask you something that I've always wondered about you.
8. If I do this for you, you must post this on your LJ.

I found this link on Neil Gaiman's livejournal, and spent some time going through it. It's both . . . fascinating, disgusting, and repellant all at once. I found myself preferring the pictures before they were 'retouched,' to be perfectly honest. And I'm not just saying that. The retouched versions . . . they look like plastic, they just don't seem like people. All the tiny quirks that make the human body unique and interesting smoothed away, the colors made too bright and unnatural, the flaws that ought to be endearing subtracted in favor of some untouchable ideal . . .

Yes, this from the same mind that managed to conceive of Emrys. But even his perfection has personality to it, the fleeting trace of expression, a particular way of moving, a customary somewhat cynical cast that marks him as alive.

Also, all of the people in the photos are already beautiful by most people's standards. Some of them are rather too thin, but even so.

When it comes to these photos . . . I'd take the reality over the illusion any day.

Also telling is the fact that most of the touch-up work is on the women. When men appear (granted, only twice, but still), they have a lot less changed about them. And even then it's mostly changing the shadows, smoothing over an unartistic wrinkle. Their shape is not altered, not as the womens' shape is altered. There's no rounding out at the rear, no filling in the chest, no widening or lightening of the eyes.

I'll let you come to your own conclusions about it, but it certainly bears thinking about.

Interestingly, when my family went to get our portrait done for some sort of dumb church yearbook thing (there are things that I do for the sole reason of making my father happy. This was one of them), we were offered by the photographer the opportunity to have the photo altered, the small blemishes smoothed over with a forgiving paintbrush tool. I'm happy to say that we refused, but I wonder how many other people did. And why they felt it necessary to have a book lie about them, when memory contradicts . . . ah, but memory is as easily edited as a photo, when you get right down to it. And the edited photo will serve to edit the memory, until they become the same thing.
Friday, July 22nd, 2005 09:48 pm
Geez, people, I'm going to Japan for a year, I'm not dying.

Unless you guys know something I don't . . .
Thursday, July 7th, 2005 10:26 am
If you haven't heard about the attacks in London yet, stop by the BBC or the Gaurdian for complete and up-to-date coverage. The Gaurdian's blog is updated continuously as they get more information. This livejournal community has many postings regarding emergency numbers, people checking in, alternative ways to contact Londoners if needed, and direct reports from people who are actually in London.

I love London fully as much as I love New York, if not . . . well. Absence makes the heart grow fonder, it has been said.

Not directly newsworthy, but very interesting, is this article on the internet reaction to the attacks. Which I am contributing to with this post.
Friday, June 10th, 2005 12:34 pm
Currently attempting to fathom the arcane mystery that is the publishing industry. Technically I work in the publishing industry, but the company I work for is very small and I'm only just getting involved in the publishing aspect. This article, lifted from Neil Gaiman's blog/live journal, is an excellent glimpse into its strange interior workings. I even spoke to my sister about it:

Me: You know, I don't think anyone understands the publishing industry except the publishing industry. You work for the government, it's kinda like that. No one understands how the government works except the government.
Her: I've got news for you, the government has no idea how the hell the government works.

Undoubtably true, and more than a little frightening. Although for something as vast and spralling as a national government, not horribly surprising.

This article on US relations with North Korea is a fascinating one. I have a more-than-passing interest in the issue-- you might recall my ruminations on a documentary I watched on the subject of North Korea-- and I think that the US is exacerbating an already fragile situation. Between the various wars of the last five years, the Korean situation, and the row over Bush's nomination for U.N. ambassador, I can't say the current administration is particularly adept when it comes to diplomacy.

Wow, understatement.

And of course, Bush wants the Patriot Act renewed, too. He goes to such incredible lengths to convince me to reconsider my opinion on him, he really does.
Thursday, June 2nd, 2005 11:46 am
This article makes for fascinating reading. I never knew exactly what the "Watergate Scandal" entailed, but from the article it sounds like the plot of a spy or conspiracy movie. The kind where you're thinking, "surely the real world doesn't actually work this way . . ."

Throw in a car chase and a famous actor and it's a sure recipe for box office success. In fact, it was made into a movie in 1976; "All the President's Men." Not that I've seen it.

The article by Bob Woodward

More information . . .

This article on the "stem cell adoption issue" is also of interest to me. No matter what your position on stem cell research, finding homes for 9,000 (at least) potential babies is difficult at best and impossible at worst. There are thousands upon thousands of children alive right now who are in need of homes and not nearly enough people to adopt them. Nevermind overseas adoption; we have a government-run foster care system (I know nothing about this, really) to take care of children who no one has yet adopted.

Adopting an embryo is even more difficult than adopting a child, though-- it has to be implanted into the surrogate mother and incubated for the requisate eight months or so.

Also interesting is that one orginization cited in the article claims to have found embryo donors for 145 families-- and of those 145, 59 of the pregnancies have been successful, producing a total of 81 children (that potentially means 22 sets of twins, unless there were triplets). Which means that only about 2/5 of the pregnancies were successful. I don't know how that compares to national statistics, but it certainly makes me think about the issue in a different way.

It amuses me to see the Catholic church and other conservative churches split on this issue, though. People make such conundrums for themselves . . . sometimes I think they must enjoy it, the debate and the guilt and the stress and the moral back-and-forthing, because they seem to go out of their way to create it. Of course, they would argue that they themselves don't create it; I'm not going to comment on that one.

In any case, I like to think of myself as a practically-minded person as far as my positions on politics are concerned. I follow my reason and my heart in tandem whenever possible, and that path is never mapped out or codified in any book. I also try not to force my opinions on other people, even when I'm posting current events-related information here (though it's probably fairly clear what I think despite that).

Despite the last, I will state straight out what should be abundantly clear to everyone who has ever bothered to read my political ramblings: I don't like President George W. Bush.

In fact I dislike him to the point that my bias infringes deeply on my efforts to be level-headed and fair in my consideration of any issue that he might express a public opinion on. So articles like this one fill me with a cheerful glee inappropriate for the prospect of a potentially crippled national government. But if it means that Bush can't get anything done, I can't help but feel it's a good thing.

Random curiosity: do any of you actually read my politicky posts?
Wednesday, May 4th, 2005 02:21 am
Politics? Surely not!

Here's one of the major problems with the war on terrorism, specifically in the domestic sphere: this article tells about how our current Attorney General still believes domestic terrorism is a threat to the US and should not be dismissed. There haven't been any incidents since September 11, of course, and no one's mentioned the 'terrorism alert level' for a good long time. Who knows what color we're at . . . perhaps a pleasant shade of tulip pink in honor of the upcoming Mother's Day, I don't know.

The problem is that it's impossible to prove that there is no longer a terrorist threat. No matter what, it will always remain a possibility. The government can easily claim that the lack of terrorist activity in this country is a result of their vigilence, not because there is no longer a threat, and there's really no way to disprove it. The only way to prove that said vigilence is not protecting the American people is to have a terrorist attack on US soil, and that would of course necessitate greater government effort, not less.

You can't prove a negative, it simply doesn't work.

And the result:

"The Bush administration has argued the continuing terror threat is the key reason Congress must renew certain portions of the Patriot Act, the key anti-terrorism legislation passed in the weeks after the September 11, 2001, attacks."

How can you say that there isn't a threat when your enemy is an ill-defined concept rather than a fixed entity?

At least the renewal of the Patriot Act is sparking debate, and some bizarre alliances. Proponents of the Act claim that no government abuses of the power granted by the bill have occured. I can't say whether they have or not, but they have the potential to occur, and that makes the Patriot Act dangerous. I'm glad to see that others agree with my perspective:

"And just because the Patriot Act hasn't been abused yet doesn't mean it won't be by government officials in the future, said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform."

And ah, the fickle tides of public opinion.

In other news, while I admit to being a bit worried about the North Korean situation, especially in light of my upcoming year-long sojourn in Japan, the main thing I got out of this article is a sad sense of regret for a past era. Once upon a time our politicians had to be good public speakers, rhetorical masters, commanders of the art of persuasion and argument. But nowadays our Secretary of State tosses out jems such as this one:

"I don't think there should be any doubt about our ability to deter whatever the North Koreans are up to."

There are so very many things wrong with that statement it's difficult to list them all. Start with the fact that it's so vague it doesn't actually say anything at all, save that it might have something to do with North Korea. The editor in me would strike that scentence out of a serious argumentative document in a second because it's completely useless and conveys absolutely no information. It isn't even convincing as an emotional appeal, let alone a logical one.

Actually, the news on CNN is really interesting today, in a quasi-outrageous way. Here's another article on a court debate as to whether or not a thirteen-year-old should be allowed to get an abortion. This is one of those tragic borderline cases that pro-lifers have a hard time standing up against; who can feel justified or righteous in forcing a thirteen-year-old living in state custody to carry a child to term? Even Jeb Bush isn't stupid enough to try that one.

Final observation after browsing CNN's news page: their polls are worse than useless most of the time. Not only are they of severely questionable validity (which, to be fair, their disclaimer points out), but the questions are moronic and deeply biased. "Which do you think is facing the bigger threat from al Qaeda? U.S. domestic targets or U.S. interests abroad?" The question assumes that al Qaeda still exists, that it is a threat both to U.S. domestic targets and U.S. interests abroad, and that it only has two targets. Further, neither of the two options are specifically defined. What counts as a U.S. domestic target? What are U.S. interests abroad? Does that mean foreign territories under U.S. control, the countries that the U.S. has treaties or trade ties with (which would be just about every other country in the world, I expect), countries where U.S. troops are stationed, U.S. activities in the Middle East, or something else?

It disturbs me that reading the news is insulting to my intelligence. Maybe this is the end result of four years of liberal arts education? I have no idea.
Monday, January 24th, 2005 01:17 am
In case you didn't notice, there have been no posts regarding politics or the state of the nation on my livejournal since the election.

When most people on my friend's list were ranting about their frustration and anger, I was silent. There have been no reactions, no thoughts on national and international events, no links to articles or political cartoons or any of the things that used to litter my posts.

The reasons have been many and varried. The election was one of them, definately. When I found out that Kerry conceded, I spent an hour just sitting, trying very hard not to explode. How I would have exploded, I couldn't tell you. [livejournal.com profile] vash_donutangel put it exceptionally well, and quite adorably (in my somewhat bizarre opinion), in her post regarding the inauguration. Other people, such as Andy here, reacted and did better than I ever could. I haven't been reading the news very much; there are always other things that require my attention, and I haven't made the time to way I used to (I made an exception when the tsunami struck). About the most political thing I've done lately is answer questions for the 2010 government census because my roommates and I were randomly selected to participate.

That was kinda neat, actually.

I guess I'm just out of steam, for the time being. Oh, sure, things like this and this still amuse me to no end (did you read the sub-headline on that last one? Come on, that is hilarious), and articles like this still anger me, and articles like this make me feel that maybe not everyone's deaf, blind, and stupid. But I don't feel the energy I once did to write on it, which is my version of doing something about it.

I still think about it, though. I'm reading a book on one of China's far western provinces, Xinjiang. One of the most worrying things I read was how China used Bush's "war on terror" to justify a crackdown on minority groups there, saying that these groups had used terrorist tactics and were dangerous. Whether true or not, justified or not, it shows a government turning Bush's zeal and tendancy to use absolute statements to allow them to act in ways that might otherwise be frowned upon. It ups the liklihood of violent conflict breaking out, and throws negotiation, diplomacy, and international mediation right out the window.

Boromir's got a point, after all. I mean, what about the ninjas? And the bears with lasers? Huh? Are you going to remove them from international policy considerations? You can't just bypass them!
Monday, November 1st, 2004 09:51 pm
If anyone who reads this has managed to maintain a favorable opinion of George W. Bush or his administration, I recomend reading the following: 100 Facts and 1 Opinion. Everyone else can read it out of their own inherent masocism. It's more than a little painful, and frightening.

Tomorrow's the big day, people. VOTE.